<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Words and Acts &#8230; and Freakonomics Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulmitchinson.com/archives/116/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulmitchinson.com/archives/116</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:28:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: paulmitchinson.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Carlin Romano on William Bennett</title>
		<link>http://paulmitchinson.com/archives/116/comment-page-1#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>paulmitchinson.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Carlin Romano on William Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmitchinson.com/?p=116#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] This is such a sleepy blog that I doubt folks like Carlin Romano read it. Still, it&#8217;s a wonderful coincidence that, two weeks after my post comparing Romano with William Bennett, Romano himself has weighed in with a defense of the radio host &#8212; or as Romano refers to him, an &#8220;academic philosopher by training.&#8221; Bennett &#8230; tried to spotlight what he considered the wrongheadedness of the argument â€” the notion, by his natural-law beliefs, that good economic consequences (lower crime) of an immoral act (abortion) can justify the immoral act â€” by countering with a more extreme hypothetical proposition or conditional. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is such a sleepy blog that I doubt folks like Carlin Romano read it. Still, it&#8217;s a wonderful coincidence that, two weeks after my post comparing Romano with William Bennett, Romano himself has weighed in with a defense of the radio host &#8212; or as Romano refers to him, an &#8220;academic philosopher by training.&#8221; Bennett &#8230; tried to spotlight what he considered the wrongheadedness of the argument â€” the notion, by his natural-law beliefs, that good economic consequences (lower crime) of an immoral act (abortion) can justify the immoral act â€” by countering with a more extreme hypothetical proposition or conditional. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
