Comments on: Putting the “Freak” in “Freakonomics” http://paulmitchinson.com/archives/70 Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:28:30 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: paulmitchinson.com » Blog Archive » Seth Roberts and Freakonomics Revisited http://paulmitchinson.com/archives/70/comment-page-1#comment-21 paulmitchinson.com » Blog Archive » Seth Roberts and Freakonomics Revisited Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:24:21 +0000 http://paulmitchinson.com/?p=70#comment-21 [...] I received a gently critical remark from a reader, and an entirely reasonable objection from Seth Roberts himself, in response to my feverish rant against Freakonomics from a couple weeks ago. [...] [...] I received a gently critical remark from a reader, and an entirely reasonable objection from Seth Roberts himself, in response to my feverish rant against Freakonomics from a couple weeks ago. [...]

]]> By: Seth Roberts http://paulmitchinson.com/archives/70/comment-page-1#comment-20 Seth Roberts Sun, 25 Sep 2005 03:20:50 +0000 http://paulmitchinson.com/?p=70#comment-20 Paul, how do you explain the numerous success stories posted as comments? I count ten successes and two failures as of today (24 Sep 05). Seth Paul,

how do you explain the numerous success stories posted as comments? I count ten successes and two failures as of today (24 Sep 05).

Seth

]]>